|
|
John edward Hibbert$1.78University, MS 3/26/08 $810,040.11 |
9 10/29/08 -18.2% -19% |
|
|
Posted 7/26/2008, 4:35 am
i would have to disagree, garmin specializes in advanced GPS units. The so called gps on phones, are not detailed, and sometimes unhelpful. Granted, i am a garmin owner, but i once was in a different state with a friend, and we were trying to find a location in the city, after failed attempts with his iphone for 20 min, 2 min with my garmin, and we were able to find it. also, being 19, i have a garmin, and not an iphone, and have no plans of getting an iphone. wouldnt trade my gps for a iphone either. On the otherhand, as a backpacker/hiker, i find that the TRUE intention of garmin equipment, is just that: outdoors. Considering your average 22 year old probably never spends time in the woods, you would just use your iphone, but out in the woods, miles from any road, i think ill trust the reception on my gps rather than an iphone. cell phone based gps are very low reception, and may seem better because they base triangulation off cell towers, in a place with no cell towers, they will get low signals
|
|
|
Posted 7/1/2008, 7:58 pm
While Car GPS is the biggest portion of revenue, have you
considered the repercussions of a Cellphone ban like the one in
California. I would assume that would lead to not being able to use
Car GPS.
|